Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert the retry applyRecord when loadEdit #4938

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 24, 2022

Conversation

hehechen
Copy link
Contributor

@hehechen hehechen commented May 20, 2022

Signed-off-by: hehechen awd123456sss@gmail.com

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #4937

Problem Summary:
The sequence is 0 when doing loadEdit, so that the gcInMemEntries can't remove the deleted pages.
After #4948, there is no need to retry applyRecord when loadEdit, so we can remove the retry applyRecord when loadEdit.

What is changed and how it works?

Remove the retry applyRecord when loadEdit.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

None

Signed-off-by: hehechen <awd123456sss@gmail.com>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented May 20, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • JaySon-Huang
  • jiaqizho

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed labels May 20, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 20, 2022
@hehechen hehechen requested a review from jiaqizho May 20, 2022 01:24
@jiaqizho
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. needs-cherry-pick-release-6.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.1 branch. and removed do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed labels May 20, 2022
@jiaqizho
Copy link
Contributor

/unhold But it's not the root cause to fix this problem.

@JaySon-Huang JaySon-Huang changed the title fix sequence when loadedit update the sequence when PageDirectoryFactory need to resolve error May 20, 2022
@JaySon-Huang JaySon-Huang added the type/bugfix This PR fixes a bug. label May 20, 2022
@JaySon-Huang
Copy link
Contributor

/run-all-tests

@hehechen
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 23, 2022
@hehechen hehechen changed the title update the sequence when PageDirectoryFactory need to resolve error Revert the retry applyRecord when loadEdit May 23, 2022
Signed-off-by: hehechen <awd123456sss@gmail.com>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 23, 2022
@hehechen
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label May 24, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@JaySon-Huang JaySon-Huang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels May 24, 2022
@JaySon-Huang
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@JaySon-Huang: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: b1d48d1

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label May 24, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

sre-bot commented May 24, 2022

Coverage for changed files

Filename                           Regions    Missed Regions     Cover   Functions  Missed Functions  Executed       Lines      Missed Lines     Cover    Branches   Missed Branches     Cover
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PageDirectoryFactory.cpp                49                 3    93.88%           5                 0   100.00%         124                 6    95.16%          50                 5    90.00%
PageDirectoryFactory.h                   2                 0   100.00%           2                 0   100.00%           8                 0   100.00%           0                 0         -
tests/gtest_page_directory.cpp        9820              1785    81.82%          54                 0   100.00%        1773                 7    99.61%        3104              1573    49.32%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                                 9871              1788    81.89%          61                 0   100.00%        1905                13    99.32%        3154              1578    49.97%

Coverage summary

Functions  MissedFunctions  Executed  Lines   MissedLines  Cover
18220      9784             46.30%    203962  97951        51.98%

full coverage report (for internal network access only)

@sre-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

sre-bot commented May 24, 2022

Coverage for changed files

Filename                           Regions    Missed Regions     Cover   Functions  Missed Functions  Executed       Lines      Missed Lines     Cover    Branches   Missed Branches     Cover
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PageDirectoryFactory.cpp                49                 3    93.88%           5                 0   100.00%         124                 6    95.16%          50                 5    90.00%
PageDirectoryFactory.h                   2                 0   100.00%           2                 0   100.00%           8                 0   100.00%           0                 0         -
tests/gtest_page_directory.cpp        9820              1785    81.82%          54                 0   100.00%        1773                 7    99.61%        3104              1573    49.32%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                                 9871              1788    81.89%          61                 0   100.00%        1905                13    99.32%        3154              1578    49.97%

Coverage summary

Functions  MissedFunctions  Executed  Lines   MissedLines  Cover
18220      9784             46.30%    203962  97967        51.97%

full coverage report (for internal network access only)

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 44f0999 into pingcap:master May 24, 2022
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #4980.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-cherry-pick-release-6.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.1 branch. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/bugfix This PR fixes a bug.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PageStorage V3 GC can't work when restore
5 participants