Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix ifnull bug (#4832) #4834

Conversation

ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This is an automated cherry-pick of #4832

Signed-off-by: xufei xufeixw@mail.ustc.edu.cn

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #4829

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

The root cause is for
ifnull(col1, col2)
TiFlash should rewrite it to
multiIf(isnull(col1), col2, assumeNotNull(col1))
but it rewrite it to
multiIf(isnull(col1), assumeNotNull(col2), col1)

Why unit test does not find this bug:
Because unit test and DAGExpressionAnalyze does not share the same rewrite code, and unit test rewrite it correctly. We should enhance the test framework to ensure the function rewrite logic is the same between unit test and DAGExpressionAnalyze.(#4830)

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Fix ifNull bug if the second argument contains null

Signed-off-by: xufei <xufeixw@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

ti-chi-bot commented May 6, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • SeaRise

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. label May 6, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot mentioned this pull request May 6, 2022
12 tasks
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-6.0 labels May 6, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label May 7, 2022
@windtalker
Copy link
Contributor

Close as there is no more version based on 6.0 branch

@windtalker windtalker closed this Jun 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. type/cherry-pick-for-release-6.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants