lightning: fix parquet import always fail

[D3Hunter]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #49368

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  import parquet file, success(fail before this pr)
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

[tiprow]

Hi @D3Hunter. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[D3Hunter]

/test pull-lightning-integration-test

[tiprow]

@D3Hunter: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/test pull-lightning-integration-test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #49391 (c376587) into master (24606a4) will increase coverage by 1.9617%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is 0.0000%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #49391        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   71.0508%   73.0126%   +1.9617%     
================================================
  Files          1368       1412        +44     
  Lines        401628     414223     +12595     
================================================
+ Hits         285360     302435     +17075     
+ Misses        96426      92614      -3812     
+ Partials      19842      19174       -668     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	47.0823% <0.0000%> (?)
unit	71.0508% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	53.9663% <ø> (ø)
parser	∅ <ø> (∅)
br	56.1874% <0.0000%> (+3.2940%)	⬆️

[lance6716]

/retest

lightning CI passed

[tiprow]

@lance6716: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

lightning CI passed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lance6716, tangenta

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• br/pkg/lightning/OWNERS [lance6716]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2023-12-12 12:31:00.909703163 +0000 UTC m=+359351.946930087: ☑️ agreed by lance6716.
• 2023-12-12 13:25:43.951199076 +0000 UTC m=+362634.988426004: ☑️ agreed by tangenta.

[D3Hunter]

ci pass
https://do.pingcap.net/jenkins/blue/organizations/jenkins/pingcap%2Ftidb%2Fpull_lightning_integration_test/detail/pull_lightning_integration_test/12/pipeline