Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

executor: split hashjoin part4 #39155

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Nov 23, 2022
Merged

Conversation

XuHuaiyu
Copy link
Contributor

@XuHuaiyu XuHuaiyu commented Nov 15, 2022

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #39061

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@XuHuaiyu XuHuaiyu added the type/enhancement The issue or PR belongs to an enhancement. label Nov 15, 2022
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Nov 15, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • guo-shaoge
  • wshwsh12

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 15, 2022
executor/join.go Outdated
@@ -69,6 +78,10 @@ type probeSideTupleFetcher struct {
}

type probeWorker struct {
*hashJoinCtx
sessCtx sessionctx.Context
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Move to hashJoinCtx?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll move it if needed in the following PRs.

probeKeys []*expression.Column
probeNAKeys []*expression.Column
buildKeys []*expression.Column
buildNAKeys []*expression.Column
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why only move buildNAKeys into hashJoinCtx?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

executor/join.go Outdated
Comment on lines 501 to 504
if w.useOuterToBuild {
ok, joinResult = w.join2ChunkForOuterHashJoin(probeSideResult, hCtx, joinResult)
} else {
ok, joinResult = e.join2Chunk(workerID, probeSideResult, hCtx, e.probeWorkers[workerID].rowContainerForProbe, joinResult, selected)
ok, joinResult = w.join2Chunk(probeSideResult, hCtx, w.rowContainerForProbe, joinResult, selected)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why join2ChunkForOuterHashJoin remove the arg e.probeWorkers[workerID].rowContainerForProbe but join2Chunk not?

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Nov 23, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Nov 23, 2022
@XuHuaiyu
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: cbedbb7

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 23, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit fee8ed7 into pingcap:master Nov 23, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Nov 23, 2022

TiDB MergeCI notify

🔴 Bad News! New failing [1] after this pr merged.
These new failed integration tests seem to be caused by the current PR, please try to fix these new failed integration tests, thanks!

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test 🟥 failed 1, success 10, total 11 15 min New failing
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🔴 failed 6, success 22, total 28 11 min Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🔴 failed 1, success 0, total 1 11 min Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test ✅ all 39 tests passed 21 min Fixed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test ✅ all 6 tests passed 7 min 35 sec Fixed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test 🟢 all 17 tests passed 15 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 6 min 55 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 🟢 all 26 tests passed 6 min 39 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 31 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

XuHuaiyu added a commit to XuHuaiyu/tidb that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2022
XuHuaiyu added a commit to XuHuaiyu/tidb that referenced this pull request Dec 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/enhancement The issue or PR belongs to an enhancement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants