Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DDL: Remove TiFlash replica progress etcd dependency #38564

Merged
merged 23 commits into from
Oct 31, 2022

Conversation

hehechen
Copy link
Contributor

@hehechen hehechen commented Oct 20, 2022

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #38464

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

Update TiFlash replica progress in the cache in DDL owner, avoiding the impact on ETCD in the case of many tables.
Send cop request to DDL owner to get TiFlash replica progress when query information_schema.tiflash_replica.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    Create a table, set TiFlash replica, and then SELECT * FROM information_schema.tiflash_replica on two TiDB node, and do some restart operations at the same time.
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Oct 20, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • breezewish
  • windtalker

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 20, 2022
hehechen and others added 4 commits October 20, 2022 23:43
Signed-off-by: hehechen <chentongli@pingcap.com>
Signed-off-by: hehechen <chentongli@pingcap.com>
Signed-off-by: hehechen <chentongli@pingcap.com>
fix
Signed-off-by: hehechen <chentongli@pingcap.com>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 21, 2022
Signed-off-by: hehechen <awd123456sss@gmail.com>
@hehechen hehechen marked this pull request as ready for review October 21, 2022 08:09
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 21, 2022
@hehechen
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @breezewish @CalvinNeo @crazycs520

Signed-off-by: hehechen <awd123456sss@gmail.com>
server/util.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: hehechen <chentongli@pingcap.com>
@hehechen
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-build

@hehechen
Copy link
Contributor Author

/rebuild

Signed-off-by: hehechen <chentongli@pingcap.com>
domain/infosync/tiflash_manager.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
domain/infosync/tiflash_manager.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
executor/infoschema_reader.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ddl/ddl_tiflash_api.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
planner/core/logical_plan_builder.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@CalvinNeo CalvinNeo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@CalvinNeo: Thanks for your review. The bot only counts approvals from reviewers and higher roles in list, but you're still welcome to leave your comments.

In response to this:

lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

infoschema/cluster.go Show resolved Hide resolved
executor/table_reader.go Show resolved Hide resolved
executor/infoschema_reader.go Show resolved Hide resolved
infoschema/cluster.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
infoschema/cluster.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
domain/infosync/info.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
domain/infosync/info.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@hehechen hehechen force-pushed the remove_etcd branch 3 times, most recently from 9d1d008 to ae83aaf Compare October 28, 2022 09:38
Signed-off-by: hehechen <chentongli@pingcap.com>
hehechen added 2 commits October 28, 2022 18:00
Signed-off-by: hehechen <chentongli@pingcap.com>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 28, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 28, 2022
hehechen and others added 3 commits October 28, 2022 19:02
Signed-off-by: hehechen <chentongli@pingcap.com>
Signed-off-by: hehechen <chentongli@pingcap.com>
ddl/ddl_tiflash_api.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: hehechen <chentongli@pingcap.com>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Oct 30, 2022
@hehechen
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-unit-test

Copy link
Contributor

@windtalker windtalker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Oct 31, 2022
@breezewish
Copy link
Member

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 52b34a6

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Oct 31, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 8355181 into pingcap:master Oct 31, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Oct 31, 2022

TiDB MergeCI notify

✅ Well Done! New fixed [1] after this pr merged.

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test 🔴 failed 2, success 4, total 6 24 min Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test ✅ all 17 tests passed 9 min 44 sec Fixed
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test 🟢 all 38 tests passed 21 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test 🟢 all 11 tests passed 13 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 7 min 7 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🟢 all 28 tests passed 5 min 5 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 🟢 all 26 tests passed 4 min 14 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 14 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 2 min 49 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

It's no need to store TiFlash replica progress in ETCD.
8 participants