-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
planner: consider disk cost in Sort #14708
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
planner/core/task.go
Outdated
@@ -841,19 +841,45 @@ func (p *PhysicalTopN) allColsFromSchema(schema *expression.Schema) bool { | |||
return len(schema.ColumnsIndices(cols)) > 0 | |||
} | |||
|
|||
func (p *PhysicalSort) avgRowSize(schema *expression.Schema) (size float64) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we reuse the avgRowSize
function of the PhysicalHashJoin
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
/run-all-tests |
@wshwsh12 merge failed. |
/rebuild |
/merge |
/run-all-tests |
What problem does this PR solve?
Consider disk cost in Sort.
What is changed and how it works?
Check List
Tests
Code changes
Side effects
Related changes
Release note