scheduler: inject a failure by pod annotation (#716) #739
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This can be useful for testing scheduling failures. You can for example add it to monitor-deployment along with changing the scheduler to the custom scheduler.
weekface
approved these changes
Aug 8, 2019
yahonda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 27, 2021
* update dashboard.md * update doc * address comments * address comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
cherry-pick #716 to release-1.0
This can be useful for testing scheduling failures.
You can for example add it to monitor-deployment
along with changing the scheduler to the custom scheduler.
What problem does this PR solve?
What is changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
I tested as mentioned in the PR. I observed that no other pods had failed scheduling, including after deploying a second TiDB cluster.
Code changes
Side effects
Related changes
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: