Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tests: Use dnssec.works instead of verteiltesysteme.net #1470

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 9, 2022

Conversation

DL6ER
Copy link
Member

@DL6ER DL6ER commented Nov 9, 2022

By submitting this pull request, I confirm the following:

  • I have read and understood the contributors guide.
  • I have checked that another pull request for this purpose does not exist.
  • I have considered, and confirmed that this submission will be valuable to others.
  • I accept that this submission may not be used, and the pull request closed at the will of the maintainer.
  • I give this submission freely, and claim no ownership to its content.

How familiar are you with the codebase?:

10


Use dnssec.works instead of verteiltesysteme.net for FTL's CI tests as the latter broke (see here for further details). This PR updates the test to use a different DNSSEC validation service: https://dnssec.works/

Signed-off-by: DL6ER <dl6er@dl6er.de>
@DL6ER DL6ER requested a review from a team November 9, 2022 18:43
@DL6ER DL6ER mentioned this pull request Nov 9, 2022
5 tasks
@DL6ER DL6ER merged commit aa57cee into development Nov 9, 2022
@DL6ER DL6ER deleted the tests/dnssec.works branch November 9, 2022 19:08
@pralor-bot
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on Pi-hole Userspace. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/unbound-pi-hole-resolving-with-huge-delay-throwing-4711-hostname-problem/61114/3

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants