Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GIR of ShuttleworthWallace description #35

Closed
richardneumann84 opened this issue May 9, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

GIR of ShuttleworthWallace description #35

richardneumann84 opened this issue May 9, 2018 · 4 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@richardneumann84
Copy link

using GIR in a simple model (attached file) with and without canopy cover results in
grafik
and
grafik
and
grafik
this makes me think GIR is potential evaporation of an openwater like storage (cell.surfacewater) in [mm/day] is this right?
But I can't find any formula in your API Documentaion or tutorials how it is calculated.

Could you please provide a more detailed description?

GIR_test_modell.zip

@philippkraft philippkraft self-assigned this May 9, 2018
@philippkraft philippkraft added this to the 1.4 milestone May 9, 2018
@philippkraft
Copy link
Owner

You are right, GIR is the potential ground evaporation from the surface water below the sparse canopy. In BROOK90, ground evaporation rate (GER) is always stressed by the soil surface resistance rss, a function of the matrix potential. I have extended SW from BROOK90 with the GIR, the potential unstressed evaporation rate under a shading, transpiring and wind stopping canopy, GIR is GER with rss=0. Please note: The canopy in Shuttleworth Wallace might not be used as an intercepting water storage, but if cell.vegetation.CanopyClosure>0, the shading, air wetting and wind stopping function of the canopy still exists. The actual ground interception rate is calculated in the connection and is a function of the water level. I can fix the API documentation on that, but it will stay quite short.

@philippkraft
Copy link
Owner

@richardneumann84 can you please check the API-Doc if this solves your issue at least partial?

@philippkraft
Copy link
Owner

Ok, after more checking I have to confess the GIR routine is not the correct way to account for evaporation from surfacewater under a canopy - as the model stands, this value is underestimated. Fixing will take place in branch i35_repair_GIR

@philippkraft
Copy link
Owner

philippkraft commented May 9, 2018

Now GIR is removed from cmf and GER has the double role to act also for surface water. With that fixed the underestimation of surface water evaporation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants