Week 3 -> week 3 exercise with the details

Week-3/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+
+# Week - 3 Assignment

Week-3/exercise_3.1/Readme.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+# Exercise 3.1 
+
+## JS:Exercise 3.1:
+- Create a memoize function that remembers previous inputs and stores them in cache so that it won’t have to compute the same inputs more than once. 
+- The function will take an unspecified number of integer inputs and a reducer method.(1.5hours)
+
+### Example:
+```
+// Given reducer method:
+function add(a,b){
+  return a+b
+  } 
+//Create a method called memoize such that
+
+const memoizeAdd=memoize(add) 
+//then calling...
+memoizeAdd(100,100); //returns 200
+memoizeAdd(100) ;//returns 100
+memoizeAdd(100,200) //returns 300
+memoizeAdd(100,100) //returns 200 without computing
+```
+
+### Guidelines:
+1. The memozie function should be written from scratch.
+2. 3rd party libraries such as loaddash or underscore should not have been used.
+3. The function should carry a name which should denote the functionality of it.
+4. The function should be able to take n number of arguments.
+
+### Outcomes:
+1. Understanding how caching works.
+2. Why is it important?3.The problem memoization solves.

Week-3/exercise_3.1/index.js

@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+//  create memory function 
+
+const { log, time,timeEnd } = require('console')
+
+const memorize = (_func) => {
+  const cache = new Map()
+  return (...args) => {
+    const key = args.toString();
+    if (cache.has(key)) {
+      return cache.get(key);
+    }
+    cache.set(key, _func(...args));
+    log(`Printing Cache`, cache);
+    return cache.get(key);
+  }
+}
+
+const add = (a, b) => {
+  log(`Function called for Operation ${a + b}`)
+  return a + b
+}
+
+const memorizeAdd = memorize(add)
+time("process_1");
+memorizeAdd(100,200);
+timeEnd("process_1");
+time("process_2");
+memorizeAdd(100,100);
+timeEnd("process_2");
+time("process_3");
+memorizeAdd(100,100);
+timeEnd("process_3");
+time("process_4");
+memorizeAdd(100,200);
+timeEnd("process_4");
+
+/* 
+Function called for Operation 300
+Printing Cache Map(1) { '100,200' => 300 }
+process_1: 4.671ms
+Function called for Operation 200
+Printing Cache Map(2) { '100,200' => 300, '100,100' => 200 }
+process_2: 0.244ms
+process_3: 0.007ms
+process_4: 0.013ms
+*/
+
+time("process_1");
+memorizeAdd(200,100);
+timeEnd("process_1");
+time("process_2");
+memorizeAdd(100,100);
+timeEnd("process_2");
+time("process_3");
+memorizeAdd(100,100);
+timeEnd("process_3");
+time("process_4");
+memorizeAdd(200,100);
+timeEnd("process_4");
+time("process_5");
+memorizeAdd(200,100);
+timeEnd("process_5");
+
+
+/* 
+Function called for Operation 300
+Printing Cache Map(1) { '200,100' => 300 }
+process_1: 4.955ms
+Function called for Operation 200
+Printing Cache Map(2) { '200,100' => 300, '100,100' => 200 }
+process_2: 0.351ms
+process_3: 0.008ms
+process_4: 0.007ms
+process_5: 0.01ms
+*/

Week-3/exercise_3.2/Readme.md

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+## Exercise 3.2:
+Create 3 simple functions where call, bind and apply are used. The intention of this exercise isto understand how they work and their differences.(0.5 hours)
+
+### Guidelines:
+1. The candidate should be able to explain what call, bind and apply in JS are and itsdifferences.
+2. Using live examples the candidate should be able to differentiate between them.
+### Outcome:
+1. Call, Bind, Apply are very important JS concepts.
+2. This exercise should help understand them and also understand the differences betweenthem.
+3. Writing examples for the same will help the candidate have a better understanding ofwhen and how they are used in real world scenarios

Week-3/exercise_3.2/index.js

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+const { log } = require('console')
+
+const pokemon = {
+  firstName: 'Pika',
+  lastName: 'Chu',
+  getPokeName: function () {
+    return  this.firstName + " " + this.lastName;
+  }
+}
+
+// make sure to use the old function method else will give an error 
+const pokemonName = function(snack = '', hobby = '') {
+  log(this.getPokeName() + ' I choose You!...........!!!')
+  log(this.getPokeName() + ' loves ' + snack + ' and ' + hobby)
+}
+
+// The example of bind Method in the function Domain
+
+const logPokemon = pokemonName.bind(pokemon) 
+
+// logPokemon() // Pika Chu I choose You!...........!!!
+// logPokemon('sushi' , 'algorithms') // Pika Chu loves sushi and algorithms
+
+
+// The example of call() and apply()
+
+pokemonName.call(pokemon, 'sushi', 'algorithms')
+pokemonName.apply(pokemon, ['sushi', 'algorithms'])
+
+/* 
+Pika Chu I choose You!...........!!!
+Pika Chu loves sushi and algorithms 
+*/

Week-3/exercise_3.3/Readme.md

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+
+## Exercise 3.3:
+1. What is the output of the below problem and why: [30min]
+
+```
+function createIncrement() {
+    let count=0;
+    function increment() {
+        count++;
+    }
+    let message=`Count is ${count}`;
+    function log() {
+        console.log(message);
+    }
+    return[increment,log];
+}
+const[increment,log] = createIncrement()
+
+increment();
+increment();
+increment();
+log();// What is logged? 
+
+```
+
+### Guidelines:
+1. The candidate should be able to explain the code with the desired output.
+### Outcome:
+1. The candidates will understand how ‘closure’ works in JS.
+2. The candidates will understand how ‘encapsulation’ works in JS.
+
+
+### Out put 
+log() a closure that  the message variable.
+console.log(message) 
+ - So that's why 'Count is 0' to the console.
+ - if we do increment many time then we get always a 'Count is 0'
+

Week-3/exercise_3.3/index.js

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+function createIncrement() {
+    let count = 0;
+    // console.log(count);  here count is 0
+    function increment() {
+        count++;
+        /* console.log(count);
+         here 1
+              2
+              3
+     count is 0
+        */
+    }
+let message = `Count is ${count}`; // count is 0 
+function log() {
+    console.log(message);          // message store the count value at the starting it initialize that value after not change, console.log(message,count); it show count is 0 3
+}
+
+return [increment, log];
+
+}
+const [increment, log] = createIncrement();
+increment();       // the first increment increase the count value it print 1
+increment();       // the first increment increase the count value it print 1
+increment();       // the first increment increase the count value it print 1
+log(); // What is logged?
+
+
+/* log() a closure that  the message variable.
+  console.log(message) So that's why 'Count is 0' to the console.
+  if we do increment many time then we get always a 'Count is 0'
+
+  */
+

Week-3/exercise_3.4/Readme.md

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+## Exercise 3.4 
+- Refactor the above stack implementation, using the concept of closure, such that there is noway to access items array outside of createStack() function scope: (2-3 hours)
+
+```
+function createStack() {
+  return {
+    items:[],
+    push(item) {
+      this.items.push(item);
+      },
+    pop() {
+      return this.items.pop();
+      }
+    };
+  }
+  const stack = createStack();
+  stack.push(10);
+  stack.push(5);
+  stack.pop(); // => 5
+  stack.items; // => [10]
+  stack.items= [10,100,1000]; //Encapsulation broken!
+
+  function createStack() {
+    // Write your code here...
+  }
+  const stack = createStack();
+  stack.push(10);
+  stack.push(5);
+  stack.pop(); // => 5
+  stack.items;// => undefined
+
+
+```
+
+### Guidelines:
+2. The candidate should be able to refactor the code and get the desired output.
+3. The candidate should be able to explain the code why it was not working before.
+4. The candidate should be able to explain the code why it is working now.
+
+### Outcome:
+3. The candidates will understand how ‘closure’ works in JS.
+4. The candidates will understand how ‘encapsulation’ works in JS.

Week-3/exercise_3.4/index.js

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+function createStack() {
+  const items = []; // we have declared the item before return and inside the createStack()
+  return {
+    push(item) {
+      items.push(item);
+    },
+    pop() {
+      return items.pop();
+    }
+  };
+}
+
+const stack = createStack();
+stack.push(10);
+stack.push(5);
+stack.pop(); // => 5
+
+stack.items; // => undefined