Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PC-34428 BSR pro shard strategy #16221

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 7, 2025
Merged

Conversation

mleroy-pass
Copy link
Contributor

But de la pull request

Ticket Jira (ou description si BSR) : https://passculture.atlassian.net/browse/PC-34428

Vérifications

  • J'ai écrit les tests nécessaires
  • J'ai mis à jour le fichier des plans de tests du portail pro si nécessaire
  • J'ai mis à jour la liste des routes et des titres de pages du portail pro si j'en ai rajouté/modifié ou supprimé une.
  • J'ai relu attentivement les migrations, en particulier pour éviter les locks, et je préviens les équipes Shérif et Data
  • J'ai ajouté des screenshots pour d'éventuels changements graphiques
  • J'ai fait la revue fonctionnelle de mon ticket

@mleroy-pass mleroy-pass requested review from a team as code owners February 6, 2025 14:47
@mleroy-pass mleroy-pass force-pushed the PC-34428-BSR-PRO-shard-strategy branch from c25b9b6 to 91eadaa Compare February 6, 2025 14:52
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Visit the preview URL for this PR (updated for commit b344e38):

https://pc-pro-testing--pr16221-pc-34428-bsr-pro-sha-efuqbh54.web.app

(expires Sun, 09 Feb 2025 09:27:07 GMT)

🔥 via Firebase Hosting GitHub Action 🌎

Sign: 032d233ee67e1c50d6af12e29c936c7076770eb1

@mleroy-pass mleroy-pass force-pushed the PC-34428-BSR-PRO-shard-strategy branch from 91eadaa to bfd6f05 Compare February 6, 2025 15:17
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ jobs:
GCP_EHP_WORKLOAD_IDENTITY_PROVIDER: ${{ secrets.GCP_EHP_WORKLOAD_IDENTITY_PROVIDER }}

test-pro:
name: "Tests pro"
name: "Units Tests"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
name: "Units Tests"
name: "Pro Units Tests"

Copy link
Contributor

@fseguin-pass fseguin-pass left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

J'ai suggéré des noms plus explicites pour faciliter la lecture dans la page des metrics de performances.
Sinon cela me parait top

@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ jobs:
GCP_EHP_WORKLOAD_IDENTITY_PROVIDER: ${{ secrets.GCP_EHP_WORKLOAD_IDENTITY_PROVIDER }}

test-pro:
name: "Tests pro"
name: "Units Tests"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
name: "Units Tests"
name: "Pro Units Tests"

@@ -47,32 +42,26 @@ jobs:
- run: yarn lint:js
- run: yarn lint:scss

tests-pro-unit-tests:
run-tests:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pro-unit-tests

@@ -47,32 +42,26 @@ jobs:
- run: yarn lint:js
- run: yarn lint:scss

tests-pro-unit-tests:
run-tests:
name: "Unit tests"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
name: "Unit tests"
name: "Pro Unit tests"

@mleroy-pass mleroy-pass force-pushed the PC-34428-BSR-PRO-shard-strategy branch 2 times, most recently from 5caf59f to b344e38 Compare February 7, 2025 09:19
@mleroy-pass mleroy-pass force-pushed the PC-34428-BSR-PRO-shard-strategy branch from b344e38 to 61f4738 Compare February 7, 2025 09:44
@mleroy-pass mleroy-pass merged commit fe519f8 into master Feb 7, 2025
13 checks passed
@mleroy-pass mleroy-pass deleted the PC-34428-BSR-PRO-shard-strategy branch February 7, 2025 09:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants