This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
client/authority-discovery: Publish and query on exponential interval #7545
client/authority-discovery: Publish and query on exponential interval #7545
Changes from 2 commits
6a2e46e
d4e3f9f
934381c
114aec1
a100023
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed this need to be done, otherwise the thing doesn't work at all.
However I'd suggest to put a loop around the entire body of
poll_next
instead of doing a dummy poll.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch @bkchr, thanks!
@tomaka can you expand on your idea of a loop around the entire body?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wait, no, you actually don't need this. (this code had passed my review the other day)
Since you return
Poll::Ready
, the caller has to callpoll_next
again, and this dummy registration isn't necessary.To phrase it differently: the documentation of
poll_next
mentions that you pass aWaker
that is woken up once the task is ready. In this case, you're returningReady
, so there's no need to register theWaker
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ahh yeah, I mixed Stream with Future. Sorry!