-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks ok to me
Maybe this is not needed - |
I agree focusing on v3 is probably the best strategy as it's already needed for related goals with the second Assets pallet. |
if we're doing #12740 then maybe we should as then its not delayed by xcm3. We can have it all hit master which is going to be less complicated. |
Hey, is anyone still working on this? Due to the inactivity this issue has been automatically marked as stale. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
I think we can get away with keeping copy. |
For the bridgehub we want to use a second Asset pallet for bridged assets. The suggestion is to have the
AssetId
of this instance be aMultiLocation
. HoweverMultilocation
is notCopy
, so this PR is exploring the impact of relaxing theCopy
bound to only requireClone
.cumulus companion: paritytech/cumulus#1900