-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 825
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
XcmPaymentApi: take into account AH sufficient assets #6033
Closed
mrshiposha
wants to merge
1
commit into
paritytech:master
from
UniqueNetwork:feature/ah-xcm-api-sufficient-assets
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Asset sufficiency doesn't mean it can be used to buy weight, i.e. directly pay for fees.
Asset sufficiency only means the asset is sufficient for the account to exist, i.e. you doesn't require DOT ED on that account to hold a sufficient asset.
This code is incorrect as it will return assets as suitable for directly paying fees which is not the case. I suggest you always add a simple emulator test to PoC any XCM config change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, there are comments in the code stating the opposite...
polkadot-sdk/cumulus/parachains/runtimes/assets/asset-hub-westend/src/xcm_config.rs
Lines 421 to 446 in d1c115b
Also, I ran Westend AssetHub locally. I haven't set up the pools, but sufficient assets (both from
Assets
andForeignAssets
) worked as XCM execution fees. The code under the linker above provides this functionality.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are even tests for that:
polkadot-sdk/cumulus/parachains/runtimes/assets/asset-hub-westend/tests/tests.rs
Lines 489 to 568 in d1c115b
polkadot-sdk/cumulus/parachains/runtimes/assets/asset-hub-westend/tests/tests.rs
Lines 411 to 487 in d1c115b
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah yes, it is unfortunate that the
TakeFirstAssetTrader
is still there.. afaik the plan was to remove it once we have some pools set up and can rely on the one above itSwapFirstAssetTrader
.The reason to remote
TakeFirstAssetTrader
is that it doesn't (and can't) correctly account the economic value of weight. Depending on market movements buying weight with sufficient assets can be abused to potentially severely undercut fees.AFAIK the plan still is to remove
TakeFirstAssetTrader
from system chains.(opened polkadot-fellows/runtimes#475 to track this)