-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 766
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Contracts: Refactor test builder #4158
Conversation
let message: Xcm<()> = Xcm::builder_unsafe() | ||
.withdraw_asset(assets.clone()) | ||
.deposit_asset(assets, beneficiary) | ||
.build(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@franciscoaguirre I have refactored my contracts XCM tests to use the new builders.
I am executing an XCM locally here, so I don't really need to buy_execution, is there a better choice than builder_unsafe
here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
- Moved `substrate/frame/contracts/src/tests/builder.rs` into a pub test_utils module, so we can use that in the `pallet-contracts-mock-network` tests - Refactor xcm tests to use XCM builders, and simplify the use case for xcm-send
substrate/frame/contracts/src/tests/builder.rs
into a pub test_utils module, so we can use that in thepallet-contracts-mock-network
tests