-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 665
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
prospective parachains API chain: Provide N
candidates
#3129
Comments
I think it's more complicated than a simple replacement with |
Err on what is the cheapest for the validators in the worst case (non cooperating collators). We don't have to find an optimal solution, if the parachain is producing forks. |
I guess it's no harm in accepting some amount of forks coming from collators. After all, if that weren't the case, the entire fragment trees concept could have been replaced with fragment "chains". |
Don't only provide one candidate, but N, where N is given in the message. Implementation: simple replacement of next() with take(N).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: