Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(transaction): unify the chainId type in different transaction definitions #5853

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 25, 2023
Merged

Conversation

hsyodyssey
Copy link
Contributor

According to the chainId definition here (eip2930 transaction), there is a specially defined type to represent ChainID. This type is also introduced in the other two files, here and here. It would be better to use it as a unified type for all chainID definitions?

Copy link
Member

@Rjected Rjected left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yep, it makes sense to use the named type across all transaction types. lgtm, thanks!

@rkrasiuk rkrasiuk added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 25, 2023
Merged via the queue into paradigmxyz:main with commit 7b0ecce Dec 25, 2023
27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants