Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

store receipts for local pending block #9948

Closed
mattsse opened this issue Jul 31, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #10597
Closed

store receipts for local pending block #9948

mattsse opened this issue Jul 31, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #10597
Assignees
Labels
A-rpc Related to the RPC implementation C-enhancement New feature or request D-good-first-issue Nice and easy! A great choice to get started

Comments

@mattsse
Copy link
Collaborator

mattsse commented Jul 31, 2024

Describe the feature

currently we don't store the receipts for the pending block we just built

pub struct PendingBlock {

and for eth_getBlockreceipts we don't check the local block

.pending_block_and_receipts()

TODO

  • store receipts for locally built block and integrate in LoadPendingBlock

cc @loocapro

Additional context

No response

@mattsse mattsse added C-enhancement New feature or request S-needs-triage This issue needs to be labelled D-good-first-issue Nice and easy! A great choice to get started A-rpc Related to the RPC implementation and removed S-needs-triage This issue needs to be labelled labels Jul 31, 2024
@malik672
Copy link
Contributor

malik672 commented Aug 2, 2024

@mattsse assign me

@Parikalp-Bhardwaj
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @malik672 are you still working on this issue?

@malik672
Copy link
Contributor

malik672 commented Aug 7, 2024

yeah

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-rpc Related to the RPC implementation C-enhancement New feature or request D-good-first-issue Nice and easy! A great choice to get started
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants