-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move optimism_deposit_signature to op-alloy #11781
Labels
C-enhancement
New feature or request
D-good-first-issue
Nice and easy! A great choice to get started
Comments
mattsse
added
C-enhancement
New feature or request
S-needs-triage
This issue needs to be labelled
labels
Oct 16, 2024
mattsse
added
D-good-first-issue
Nice and easy! A great choice to get started
and removed
S-needs-triage
This issue needs to be labelled
labels
Oct 16, 2024
Hey, I'd like to work on this |
3 tasks
I opened a PR on |
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
to alloy-rs/op-alloy
that referenced
this issue
Oct 16, 2024
<!-- Thank you for your Pull Request. Please provide a description above and review the requirements below. Bug fixes and new features should include tests. Contributors guide: https://github.com/alloy-rs/core/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md The contributors guide includes instructions for running rustfmt and building the documentation. --> <!-- ** Please select "Allow edits from maintainers" in the PR Options ** --> ## Motivation `optimism_deposit_tx_signature` function in `reth` should be moved to `op-alloy` as part of an [issue](paradigmxyz/reth#11781). paradigmxyz/reth#11781 <!-- Explain the context and why you're making that change. What is the problem you're trying to solve? In some cases there is not a problem and this can be thought of as being the motivation for your change. --> ## Solution An associated function `signature` is added to the `TxDeposit` struct. <!-- Summarize the solution and provide any necessary context needed to understand the code change. --> ## PR Checklist - [ ] Added Tests - [ ] Added Documentation - [ ] Breaking changes
refcell
pushed a commit
to alloy-rs/op-alloy
that referenced
this issue
Oct 22, 2024
<!-- Thank you for your Pull Request. Please provide a description above and review the requirements below. Bug fixes and new features should include tests. Contributors guide: https://github.com/alloy-rs/core/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md The contributors guide includes instructions for running rustfmt and building the documentation. --> <!-- ** Please select "Allow edits from maintainers" in the PR Options ** --> ## Motivation `optimism_deposit_tx_signature` function in `reth` should be moved to `op-alloy` as part of an [issue](paradigmxyz/reth#11781). paradigmxyz/reth#11781 <!-- Explain the context and why you're making that change. What is the problem you're trying to solve? In some cases there is not a problem and this can be thought of as being the motivation for your change. --> ## Solution An associated function `signature` is added to the `TxDeposit` struct. <!-- Summarize the solution and provide any necessary context needed to understand the code change. --> ## PR Checklist - [ ] Added Tests - [ ] Added Documentation - [ ] Breaking changes
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
C-enhancement
New feature or request
D-good-first-issue
Nice and easy! A great choice to get started
Describe the feature
we mostly need this for rpc responses or as a placeholder:
reth/crates/optimism/chainspec/src/lib.rs
Lines 181 to 185 in d4be773
this constant should be moved to op-alloy/consensus
https://github.com/alloy-rs/op-alloy
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: