DOC: add examples to groupby.first #46766
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Moisan
force-pushed
the
groupby_first_doc_nan
branch
2 times, most recently
from
2810d09
to
327fe4b
Compare
mroeschke
reviewed
Apr 16, 2022
|
doesn't this fix the same as #46792 ? though this fixes for groupby i think that is fixed as well. |
|
#46792 covers unused arguments in |
mroeschke
reviewed
Apr 17, 2022
|
@Moisan could you merge in the main branch one more time? After that LGTM |
Moisan
force-pushed
the
groupby_first_doc_nan
branch
from
0bed24b
to
9b9c4f3
Compare
mroeschke
approved these changes
Apr 24, 2022
|
thanks @Moisan |
yehoshuadimarsky
pushed a commit
to yehoshuadimarsky/pandas
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
doc/source/whatsnew/vX.X.X.rstfile if fixing a bug or adding a new feature.Add a few more examples to
groupby.first. I also removed the mention ofnumeric_only = Nonesince the code doesn't check for None any case, nor does the type allow for it.