Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ENH: Addition of input arguments for boundaries to add more consistency between methods #40627

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

hewittk
Copy link
Contributor

@hewittk hewittk commented Mar 25, 2021

@pep8speaks
Copy link

Hello @hewittk! Thanks for opening this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:

Line 1833:33: E712 comparison to True should be 'if cond is True:' or 'if cond:'
Line 1840:37: E712 comparison to False should be 'if cond is False:' or 'if not cond:'
Line 1844:89: E501 line too long (114 > 88 characters)

Line 4741:22: E712 comparison to True should be 'if cond is True:' or 'if cond:'
Line 4750:24: E712 comparison to False should be 'if cond is False:' or 'if not cond:'
Line 4754:89: E501 line too long (106 > 88 characters)

@hewittk hewittk changed the title Addition of input arguments for boundaries to add more consistency between methods ENH: Addition of input arguments for boundaries to add more consistency between methods Mar 25, 2021
@hewittk hewittk closed this Mar 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ENH: consistency of input args for boundaries
2 participants