Added back ability to flag a client who has not enrolled in any program #2068
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@patryllus Let me ask, does this means program specific flags will still be evaluated for those patients not belonging to such program? |
|
We agreed that we are not merging this in. We'll need a discussion |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Current: Flagging currently works for patients enrolled in at least one program given this implementations. I take cognisance of the need to optimise flags which are hugely expensive.
Issue: Facility wide patients/OPD, IDSR pateints who are not enrolled in any program cannot be flagged
Tentative Resolution: I have commented the section requiring a patient to be in a program for flagging to work
Ask: Kindly review and advice