error-prone UnnecessarilyQualified #1510
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Generate changelog in
|
|
Validated on a large internal project. |
|
🤖 |
|
Released 3.41.0 |
This was referenced Jun 22, 2021
This was referenced Sep 15, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Before this PR
Mixed qualified and unqualified uses of the same type in the same java file.
After this PR
Note that we don't disallow fully qualified classes, they can be useful when two types with the same simple name are used to avoid ambiguity.
==COMMIT_MSG==
error-prone UnnecessarilyQualified
==COMMIT_MSG==
Possible downsides?
Might cause code churn, however it makes the code substantially easier to follow, and fixes itself.