Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ScienceMesh: Improve alignment of token and X in accept invitation #11543

Closed
mmattel opened this issue Sep 9, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #12055
Closed

ScienceMesh: Improve alignment of token and X in accept invitation #11543

mmattel opened this issue Sep 9, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #12055
Assignees
Labels
Priority:p4-low Low priority Type:Bug Something isn't working

Comments

@mmattel
Copy link
Contributor

mmattel commented Sep 9, 2024

Deployment master from friday last week.

When adding a token into the accept invitations field, on the rights side, the X overlaps the token added, see screenshot. This should be realigned so you can see the X.

Screenshot from 2024-09-09 09-43-30

@mmattel mmattel added the Type:Bug Something isn't working label Sep 9, 2024
@JammingBen JammingBen moved this to Prio 3 or less in Infinite Scale Team Board Sep 12, 2024
@JammingBen JammingBen added the Priority:p3-medium Normal priority label Sep 12, 2024
@JammingBen JammingBen removed their assignment Sep 12, 2024
@JammingBen JammingBen added Priority:p4-low Low priority and removed Priority:p3-medium Normal priority labels Sep 26, 2024
@LukasHirt LukasHirt moved this from Prio 3 or less to In progress in Infinite Scale Team Board Dec 23, 2024
@LukasHirt LukasHirt self-assigned this Dec 23, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In progress to Done in Infinite Scale Team Board Dec 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Priority:p4-low Low priority Type:Bug Something isn't working
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants