[QA] Test coverage for OCM bugs

[prashant-gurung899]

Description

OCM setup : https://owncloud.dev/ocis/development/testing/#running-test-suite-with-federated-sharing-ocm
Future Federated space concept #10065

Bug Report

Reference of OCM bugs collection: #9735

• OCM. Restrict sharing roles to Editor / Viewer in sharing dialog #9745
  • Test coverage tracked in [QA] tests to list item permissions with filters #10728
• [QA][OCM] no notification when receiving a federated share #10718
  • Will be covered here: [QA] Extend notification tests #10937
• OCM. folders are created with “/” in the shares #10582
• OCM. [QA] federated user from different instances are indistinguishable when they share the same full name #10734
• [QA][OCM] Hide & Enable Sync fail with received federated shares #10719
• OCM. delete-accepted-user endpoint always returns 200 #10223
• try to find federation users after deleting federated connection
  • OCM. federated connection is not dropped when one of the users deletes the connection #10216
  • Covered here: [test-only] delete connection tests #10224
• [OCM] User can share resource to federated user with permission roles that is not allowed #10824
• [OCM] federated user trying to download file shared with permissions role Secure Viewer returns 500 status code #10822
• Changing permissions for federated shares web#12149
• https://github.com/owncloud/enterprise/issues/7075
• https://github.com/owncloud/enterprise/issues/7073

[wkloucek]

@prashant-gurung899 Sorry for hijacking this issue, but are there by any chance some concurrency tests already? Something like creating two OCM shares at "the same time" (I'm not sure if we need / can achieve exact same time execution). I'd be curios if we could see something like race condition situations with the current single file JSON backend if we send multiple requests at once.

[saw-jan]

We have an open ticket for parallel sharing (but that have different use-cases than just a share).

But if it's just doing multiple shares by a single user in parallel, then maybe it's possible with the current API test setup.

[wkloucek]

Nice thanks for that information! That's what I wanted to know. 👍