Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[tests-only]added tus tests for OPTIONS request #38185

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 3, 2020

Conversation

swoichha
Copy link
Contributor

@swoichha swoichha commented Dec 2, 2020

Description

test for TUS for OPTIONS request to check if it gives all the needed and correct information

Related Issue

How Has This Been Tested?

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Database schema changes (next release will require increase of minor version instead of patch)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Technical debt
  • Tests only (no source changes)

Checklist:

  • Code changes
  • Unit tests added
  • Acceptance tests added
  • Documentation ticket raised:
  • Changelog item, see TEMPLATE

@swoichha swoichha self-assigned this Dec 2, 2020
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 2, 2020

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

Copy link
Member

@individual-it individual-it left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that is interesting, no auth gives you the headers, wrong auth not. I guess that is OK that way

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants