Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Only allow links to dynamic simulations on non-behavior run #439

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2017

Conversation

talumbau
Copy link
Member

  • A file-based reform could have behavioral parameters. If this is the
    case, you should not be able to launch a dynamic simulation.
  • Adds a modal pop-up if user clicks Link to Dyn. Sims on results page
    for file based reform that includes behavior parameters.
  • Behavior is unchanged if file based reform contains no behavioral
    components
  • Depends on change to worker node
  • Resolves new features in json file #431

 - A file-based reform could have behavioral parameters. If this is the
   case, you should not be able to launch a dynamic simulation.
 - Adds a modal pop-up if user clicks Link to Dyn. Sims on results page
   for file based reform that includes behavior parameters.
 - Behavior is unchanged if file based reform contains no behavioral
   components
 - Depends on change to worker node
 - Resolves #431
@talumbau
Copy link
Member Author

@MattHJensen here is what the modal pop-up looks like. Is the text ok?

screen shot 2016-12-31 at 12 11 12 pm

@talumbau talumbau changed the title Only allow links to dyn sims on non-behavior run Only allow links to dynamic simulations on non-behavior run Dec 31, 2016
@talumbau
Copy link
Member Author

@MattHJensen
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@talumbau talumbau merged commit 689fff9 into master Jan 2, 2017
@brittainhard brittainhard deleted the flag_for_beh_file_reforms branch April 4, 2017 17:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants