-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 618
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: make epochs standalone. #4336
Conversation
I think it should be non breaking.. but will let the labelling be done by the team |
0b3cc1d
to
da48491
Compare
Awesome! Thanks for working on this! It'll be at least a day before I can dedicate time to review though On quick glance, the proto looks right to me, up to what our decision for the x/epochs first version is. (Is it version 1, 2, or 14) Tests not having entire app/simapp is a feature, as long we have all the equivalent functionality tested somewhere! (May mean that we copy some x/epochs integration tests into a new |
epochs internal is being tested via unit tests, but the apptestingKeeper has simapp which still imports epochs as a package. |
@ValarDragon @mattverse could you let me know what version you want? or should I remove and kept it ..../x/epochs? |
I personally think we don't need semantic versioning for the epoch package itself, we can go without versioning just as we do with other sub-packages(osmomath or osmoutil package). Also, apologies to the late review that causes all the merge conflicts 😭 , planning to review this as this PR has the versioing fixed |
7ece52d
to
f17c63b
Compare
Awesome, done the versioning, removed it
|
btw
I get this message, but when I just pick the module version in other project and use it, it just works.
works Ignore:
so it is as expected.. ref |
hey @mattverse https://github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/actions/runs/4261170031/jobs/7415166905#step:4:428 |
@mattverse , in case you missed a notification |
Hey @puneet2019, apologies that I missed the last notification. Can you try pulling your local git to latest main and then merging this branch then run |
it was |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you! Please add a change log entry and refresh the PR, and we can merge it!
@p0mvn @mattverse done |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thank you
Closes: #2522 , stale/closed previous PRs #2550, #2544
some questions
What is the purpose of the change
allows to import epochs module..
Brief Changelog
Testing and Verifying
This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
Documentation and Release Note
Unreleased
section inCHANGELOG.md
? (yes / no)x/<module>/spec/
) / Osmosis docs repo / not documented)