-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 226
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lua additions/fixes #67
Conversation
- minor ldoc documentation comment fixes. - added unit tests. - added 'monitor' test script & scenario.
Damn it, git distracts me so much from "the real" work ;) |
I have to get the build process working on my machine first! |
No problem. Appreciate your effort on the code. I couldn't actually figure out why the build failed, so was trying to check out the pull request without merging (gh pr checkout 67) but got into a battle with github command line authentication ... |
Hi Kuddel, I have a fix. But you need to give me permission to push it to your pull request. |
Thank you for taking a look. I am used to github repositories where only PRs are accepted with "no issues at all"...so I'm not used to this politeness 👍 I first have to setup my machine to be able to build the project. Having to fight against git(hub) does add a little frustration, though 😁 I'll come back and possibly re-open this once it's worth it. |
and warning removal.
This seems to get build now 👍 One thing I've noticed: There are two (identical) headers for Interpreter:
I guess this resulted from the "closed-source" days of Orbiter. |
I don't get the github web frontend ...but it seems now the PR has only the needed files left.
and another one (grrr)
Yes, exactly, the Interpreter.h in Orbitersdk/include was the problem. I have removed this from the source tree now and am referencing the one in Src/Module/LuaScript/LuaInterpreter instead. Interpreter.h is still deployed to Orbitersdk/include in the build directory. The PR builds now ok. If you are happy with it I'll merge it. |
It would be an honor 😁 |
All done. Thanks! |
Pull request procedure test ;)