Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

replace autofs for mount -t nfs #67

Closed
Rendanic opened this issue Apr 21, 2018 · 2 comments · Fixed by #269
Closed

replace autofs for mount -t nfs #67

Rendanic opened this issue Apr 21, 2018 · 2 comments · Fixed by #269

Comments

@Rendanic
Copy link
Collaborator

I prefer installations with a NFS-Share for installation media and rman Backups.
What do you think about removing the tasks Mount nfs share with installation media after enabling the autofs?

I could create a PR for adding and enabling autofs. The mounts could be removed during the refactoring.

@oravirt
Copy link
Owner

oravirt commented Apr 21, 2018

I don't want to remove the task (at least not yet), since I know it is being used.

But if you want to add autofs functionality, go ahead. The autofs package is part of 'common packages' as of cd66e5b.

Rendanic pushed a commit to Rendanic/ansible-oracle that referenced this issue May 30, 2021
oracle_opatch: Use 'sqlplus -V' instead of just sqlplus when checking…
Rendanic added a commit to Rendanic/ansible-oracle that referenced this issue Sep 23, 2021
Convert repository to Ansible Collection format
@Rendanic Rendanic self-assigned this Aug 31, 2022
@Rendanic
Copy link
Collaborator Author

#269 add tasks to orasw_meta.
The new tasks makes the handling of mount/umound of installation media much easier.
No real need to use autofs for this and we had a customer which didn't allow to use autofs on the machines.

@Rendanic Rendanic linked a pull request Sep 15, 2022 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants