Skip to content

[FSSDK-10758] implement vuid configuration independent of odp #497

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

raju-opti
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

  • With this PR, VUID can be enabled/disabled independently of ODP

Test plan

  • added news tests and updated affected old tests

Issues

  • FSSDK-10758

Copy link
Contributor

@muzahidul-opti muzahidul-opti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, where do we check client_initialized event based on vuid enable status.

@raju-opti
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks good to me, where do we check client_initialized event based on vuid enable status.

this was already implemented here:

This will drop any event if there is no valid identifier but there will be a error log. I have added a new condition to check whether the vuid is not null to avoid the log: 3512a65

@muzahidul-opti

Copy link
Contributor

@jaeopt jaeopt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - with a small fix suggestion

@Synchronized
fun configure(enableVuid: Boolean, context: Context) {
if (!enableVuid) {
removeVuid(context)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
removeVuid(context)
removeVuid(context)
self.vuid = null

@raju-opti raju-opti merged commit 7bfd707 into master Nov 19, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
@raju-opti raju-opti deleted the raju/vuid branch November 19, 2024 11:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants