Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Take Zipkin off the "supported" list #258

Closed
codefromthecrypt opened this issue Apr 4, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Take Zipkin off the "supported" list #258

codefromthecrypt opened this issue Apr 4, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

codefromthecrypt commented Apr 4, 2018

No one is supporting Zipkin, @pavolloffay writes code in brave-opentracing and doesn't fix bugs. Usage patterns in READMEs are questionable at best and impact us. Your java issues list includes changes that impact us but don't proceed.

Please take Zipkin off the supported list as it misrepresents it. Doing ones best despite the odds is far from "supported"

cc openzipkin people who have stake in opentracing @basvanbeek @devinsba @jcchavezs

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor Author

this comment has a small selection of abandoned issues.

@isaachier
Copy link

isaachier commented Apr 5, 2018

You may not have to go to this extreme yet. We are working on OpenTracing API unification. For example, thread awareness is a feature that is not yet implemented in many languages (C, C++, probably a number of others). As we progress in the API unification we intend to take more responsibility in terms of our API stability/compatibility. I cannot speak for the OpenTracing contributors to this project, but that is my suggestion.

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor Author

codefromthecrypt commented Apr 5, 2018 via email

@basvanbeek
Copy link
Member

I am ok with Zipkin being removed of the list.

Zipkin's native ecosystem is vast and touches many languages, frameworks, etc. We shouldn't signal that we have the same breadth and user experience when using OpenTracing implementations or bridges for Zipkin. Some languages are closer to a good UX like Go, others not so much.

The OpenTracing implementations/bridges in the main OpenZipkin organization can expect proper support as long as we can keep them there (dependent on OpenTracing API stability and compatibility with our core concepts) but this is in my opinion not enough to help feed consumer expectations on OpenTracing-Zipkin compatibility like a native OpenTracing ecosystem would.

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor Author

#260 will fix this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants