feat: add design smb packages #2591
Conversation
WalkthroughA new module named "DesignSmb" has been introduced, which includes the addition of a new Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
[e2e-test-warn] The title of the Pull request should look like "fix(vue-renderless): [action-menu, alert] fix xxx bug". Please make sure you've read our contributing guide |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/design/smb/index.ts (2)
4-4: Consider using a more descriptive design spec name.The name 'x-design' is quite generic. Consider using a more descriptive name that reflects the SMB (Small and Medium Business) nature of this design specification.
- name: 'x-design', // 设计规范名称 + name: 'smb-design', // Design specification for Small and Medium Business
7-11: Consider documenting component configurations in English.The component configurations look good, but the comments are in Chinese. For better international collaboration, consider using English comments.
components: { Form: { props: { - hideRequiredAsterisk: true // 默认隐藏必填星号 + hideRequiredAsterisk: true // Hide required field asterisk by default } }, Button: { props: { - round: true // 默认圆角 + round: true // Use rounded corners by default } } }Also applies to: 12-16
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
internals/cli/src/commands/create/commonMapping.json(1 hunks)packages/design/smb/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/design/smb/package.json(1 hunks)packages/modules.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/design/smb/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/design/smb/index.ts (1)
1-1: Verify package.json existence and version import.
The version is imported from a local package.json file. Let's verify its existence and structure.
✅ Verification successful
Version import from package.json is correctly configured
The package.json file exists in the correct location (packages/design/smb/package.json) and contains a valid version field set to "3.20.0", which confirms that the import statement will work as expected.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if package.json exists and contains version field
# Check if package.json exists in the same directory
if [ -f "packages/design/smb/package.json" ]; then
echo "package.json exists"
# Check if it contains a version field
cat packages/design/smb/package.json | jq '.version'
else
echo "package.json not found"
fi
Length of output: 156
internals/cli/src/commands/create/commonMapping.json (1)
42-46: LGTM! Entry follows established patterns.
The new "DesignSmb" entry maintains consistency with other design entries like "DesignAurora" and "DesignSaas", using the same structure and configuration.
packages/modules.json (1)
868-872: LGTM! Entry is consistent and properly placed.
The new "DesignSmb" module entry:
- Matches the configuration in commonMapping.json
- Follows the same pattern as other design modules
- Maintains alphabetical ordering in the file
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Module path and structure are correct
The verification confirms:
- The directory
packages/design/smbexists - The entry point
index.tsexists at the specified path - The file contains valid design configuration exports
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the module path exists and is consistent
# Check if the module path exists
if [ -f "packages/design/smb/index.ts" ]; then
echo "Module path exists"
else
echo "Module path not found"
fi
# Verify path consistency between modules.json and commonMapping.json
diff <(jq -r '.DesignSmb.path' packages/modules.json) <(jq -r '.DesignSmb.path' internals/cli/src/commands/create/commonMapping.json)
Length of output: 330
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the existence and content of both JSON files first
echo "=== Checking modules.json ==="
fd -t f "modules.json" packages/ -x cat {}
echo -e "\n=== Checking commonMapping.json ==="
fd -t f "commonMapping.json" -x cat {}
echo -e "\n=== Checking the actual module directory ==="
fd . "packages/design/smb" -x ls -la {}
Length of output: 66045
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the path existence and check the directory structure
echo "=== Checking if design/smb directory exists ==="
fd -t d "smb$" packages/design
echo -e "\n=== Checking if index.ts exists ==="
fd -t f "^index.ts$" packages/design/smb
echo -e "\n=== Checking the content of index.ts if it exists ==="
fd -t f "^index.ts$" packages/design/smb -x cat {}
Length of output: 788
2 participants
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
@opentiny/vue-design-smbwith version 3.20.0, providing a structured entry point for design specifications.Documentation
commonMapping.jsonandmodules.jsonto include the new "DesignSmb" module.