Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: resolve the automatic save state invalid after refresh #991

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

SonyLeo
Copy link
Contributor

@SonyLeo SonyLeo commented Jan 3, 2025

English | 简体中文

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • Built its own designer, fully self-validated

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

Background and solution

What is the current behavior?

image

设置并保存 自动保存 后,刷新页面该勾选状态丢失

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

刷新页面后 自动保存 状态不丢失

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced auto-save functionality with persistent user preferences
    • Added ability to remember auto-save settings across user sessions
  • Improvements

    • Introduced local storage management for auto-save state
    • Implemented initialization of auto-save status on component mount
    • Added error handling for storage operations
    • New constant for auto-save management added

@github-actions github-actions bot added bug Something isn't working refactor-main refactor/develop branch feature labels Jan 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 3, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces enhancements to the save toolbar component's auto-save functionality. A new constant AUTO_SAVED is added to the utility constants, and the Main.vue file is updated to implement local storage persistence for the auto-save feature. The changes allow the component to remember and restore the user's auto-save preference across different sessions by utilizing Vue's onMounted lifecycle hook and local storage management.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/toolbars/save/src/Main.vue - Added onMounted import from Vue
- Implemented initSaveStatus method to retrieve auto-save state from local storage
- Modified autoSave method to include error handling when storing checked state in local storage
packages/utils/src/constants/index.js - Added new constant AUTO_SAVED with value 'tiny-engine-auto-saved'

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • hexqi

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of saving grace,
Local storage finds its place!
Auto-save now remembers well,
Across sessions, a magic spell 📝
Persistence hopping through the code 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/utils/src/constants/index.js (1)

97-98: Consider using a storage key prefix to avoid collisions.

While defining AUTO_SAVED is a good approach, it’s often safer to prefix storage keys for multi-app environments (e.g., 'tiny-auto-saved'). Additionally, consider centralizing all local storage keys to maintain better consistency across the codebase.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b38af9f and 033c4ad.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/toolbars/save/src/Main.vue (2 hunks)
  • packages/utils/src/constants/index.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/toolbars/save/src/Main.vue (1)

58-67: Good use of constants and lifecycle hooks.

Importing AUTO_SAVED from the constants helps avoid magic strings. Leveraging onMounted is a solid approach to initialize your state upon component load.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/toolbars/save/src/Main.vue (1)

141-146: Consider persisting the auto-save interval alongside the auto-save state.

Currently, only the auto-save enabled/disabled state is persisted. Consider also saving the user's preferred auto-save interval to provide a complete persistence of user preferences.

Example implementation:

 const autoSave = () => {
   try {
-    localStorage.setItem(AUTO_SAVED, JSON.stringify(state.checked))
+    localStorage.setItem(AUTO_SAVED, JSON.stringify({
+      enabled: state.checked,
+      interval: state.timeValue
+    }))
   } catch (error) {
     return
   }
   // ... rest of the function
 }

 const initSaveStatus = () => {
   const autoSaveValue = localStorage.getItem(AUTO_SAVED)
   try {
-    state.checked = JSON.parse(autoSaveValue) ?? false
+    const savedState = JSON.parse(autoSaveValue) ?? { enabled: false, interval: 5 }
+    state.checked = savedState.enabled
+    state.timeValue = savedState.interval
   } catch (e) {
     state.checked = false
+    state.timeValue = 5
   }
 }

Also applies to: 154-162

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 033c4ad and f595b49.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/toolbars/save/src/Main.vue (2 hunks)
  • packages/utils/src/constants/index.js (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/utils/src/constants/index.js
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/toolbars/save/src/Main.vue (4)

58-58: LGTM! Import changes are well-structured.

The addition of onMounted and constants import aligns with the implementation needs.

Also applies to: 65-67


141-146: Consider adding user feedback for storage failures.

While the try-catch block handles storage errors gracefully, silent failure might confuse users when their settings don't persist.

Consider adding user feedback:

 try {
   localStorage.setItem(AUTO_SAVED, JSON.stringify(state.checked))
 } catch (error) {
+  console.warn('Failed to save auto-save preference:', error)
+  // Using the existing tiny-engine UI components for consistency
+  TinyMessage.warning('Failed to save your auto-save preference')
   return
 }

154-162: LGTM! Robust implementation of save status initialization.

The implementation includes proper error handling and default value fallback using nullish coalescing, which aligns with best practices.


164-166: LGTM! Appropriate use of lifecycle hook.

The initialization of save status during component mount ensures proper state restoration.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
packages/toolbars/save/src/Main.vue (3)

141-146: Enhance error handling for better user feedback.

While the try-catch block is good, silently failing when localStorage operations fail could lead to a confusing user experience. Consider:

  1. Notifying users when their settings fail to save
  2. Logging errors for debugging
  3. Providing fallback behavior
 try {
   localStorage.setItem(AUTO_SAVED, JSON.stringify(state.checked))
 } catch (error) {
-  return
+  console.error('Failed to save auto-save settings:', error)
+  // Using your UI notification system (assuming it exists)
+  notify.error('Failed to save your auto-save preferences')
+  state.checked = false // Reset to default state
 }

164-167: Consider adding storage event handling.

While the initialization is well-implemented, consider adding a storage event listener to sync state across tabs/windows, and clean it up in onUnmounted:

 onMounted(() => {
   initSaveStatus()
+  // Sync state across tabs
+  const handleStorageChange = (e) => {
+    if (e.key === AUTO_SAVED) {
+      initSaveStatus()
+    }
+  }
+  window.addEventListener('storage', handleStorageChange)
+  
+  onUnmounted(() => {
+    window.removeEventListener('storage', handleStorageChange)
+  })
 })

141-162: Consider extracting storage logic to a composable.

The current implementation mixes UI and storage concerns. Consider extracting the localStorage operations into a dedicated composable for better maintainability and reusability:

// useAutoSave.ts
export function useAutoSave() {
  const getAutoSaveStatus = () => {
    try {
      const value = localStorage.getItem(AUTO_SAVED)
      return JSON.parse(value) ?? false
    } catch {
      return false
    }
  }

  const setAutoSaveStatus = (status: boolean) => {
    try {
      localStorage.setItem(AUTO_SAVED, JSON.stringify(status))
      return true
    } catch (error) {
      console.error('Failed to save auto-save settings:', error)
      return false
    }
  }

  return {
    getAutoSaveStatus,
    setAutoSaveStatus
  }
}

This would simplify the component code and make the storage logic more testable and reusable.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f595b49 and aff2a3a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/toolbars/save/src/Main.vue (2 hunks)
  • packages/utils/src/constants/index.js (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/utils/src/constants/index.js
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: push-check
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/toolbars/save/src/Main.vue (2)

58-58: LGTM! Clean import organization.

The imports are well-organized, and the constant destructuring follows best practices.

Also applies to: 66-67


154-162: Well-implemented error handling with fallback!

The implementation includes:

  • Proper error handling with try-catch
  • Default fallback using null coalescing
  • Clear single responsibility

@SonyLeo SonyLeo closed this Jan 8, 2025
@SonyLeo SonyLeo deleted the fix/autoSaved branch January 8, 2025 03:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working refactor-main refactor/develop branch feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant