Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NO-JIRA: UPSTREAM: fix request Host storing in openshift.io/during-graceful audit log annotation #2119

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

@vrutkovs vrutkovs commented Oct 22, 2024

request URL doesn't contain the host used in the request, instead it
should be fetched from request headers

Note for rebase: squash it into the following commit
vrutkovs@a83d289 UPSTREAM: : annotate audit events for requests during unready phase and graceful termination phase (#2077)

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label Oct 22, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 22, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@vrutkovs: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 22, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vrutkovs
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign bertinatto for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Oct 22, 2024
@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member Author

/payload-job-with-prs periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.18-e2e-aws-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout openshift/origin#29058

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 22, 2024

@vrutkovs: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.18-e2e-aws-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/6f39bfd0-904a-11ef-9689-ac0a7392141a-0

…aceful audit log annotation

request URL doesn't contain the host used in the request, instead it
should be fetched from request headers

Note for rebase: squash it into the following commit
a83d289 UPSTREAM: <carry>: annotate audit events for requests during unready phase and graceful termination phase
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@vrutkovs: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@vrutkovs vrutkovs changed the title HACK: fix request Host storing in openshift.io/during-graceful audit … NO-JIRA: UPSTREAM: fix request Host storing in openshift.io/during-graceful audit log annotation Nov 6, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@vrutkovs: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

In response to this:

…log annotation

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?


Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Nov 6, 2024
@vrutkovs vrutkovs marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2024 09:41
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 6, 2024
@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member Author

vrutkovs commented Nov 6, 2024

/retest

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 6, 2024

@vrutkovs: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd 708b27f link false /test e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants