-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[META] Upgrade Testing Framework Issue List #10
Comments
Some of these steps might be over-engineered. After building the simplest version of this, without its own Expectation data model, and without pexpect, we might find that the hard parts lie elsewhere. It might make sense to build the simplest version of a validator and then to work outwards from there. |
I agree we need to be careful about over-engineering on the expectations side, but pexpect is a fundamental building block on which everything else depends (it's how Python applications invoke shell calls). Also - these issues have yet to be refined by the team, I cranked them out as a stop-gap to give the team an idea on where things might head before I had to leave for vacation last Monday. I expect we'll discuss/adjust them in the coming week. |
From community demo of the UTF today - this tool exists and may be worth exploring and/or collaborating with its developers on. |
Meta issue to track the work associated with the Upgrade Testing Framework.
Framework Workstream
Expectations Workstream
Miscellaneous
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: