Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[AUTO] Update input manifests #5135

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

opensearch-ci-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

I have noticed that a repo has incremented a version. This change updates the corresponding input manifests.

Comment on lines +144 to +148
- name: opensearch-system-templates
integ-test:
test-configs:
- with-security
- without-security
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this the place to add?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@gaiksaya


2024-10-25 00:51:25 INFO     Using /var/jenkins/workspace/manifest-update/manifests/2.18.0/opensearch-2.18.0.yml as the base input manifest
2024-10-25 00:51:25 INFO     Using /var/jenkins/workspace/manifest-update/manifests/2.18.0/opensearch-2.18.0-test.yml as the base test manifest
2024-10-25 00:51:25 INFO     Wrote /var/jenkins/workspace/manifest-update/manifests/2.19.0/opensearch-2.19.0.yml as the new input manifest
2024-10-25 00:51:25 INFO     Wrote /var/jenkins/workspace/manifest-update/manifests/2.19.0/opensearch-2.19.0-test.yml as the new test manifest

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So yes it is based on the 2.18.0-test manifest.

I will update both 2.18 and 2.19.

Comment on lines 49 to 51
- '2.15'
- '2.16'
- '2.17'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we still want to keep these for patch increments like opensearch-project/k-NN#1944 (See the conversation there)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a rare care we will have a release for these tho.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right but it is a good practice to keep the branches up to date for emergency release like log4j

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oops, I didnt realize 2.17 is the last version.
I thought we are already on 2.19 now 😄
let me change.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would still recommend to keep all versions @prudhvigodithi can add too. Its just keeping the automation running from our end. At the end its on maintainers to accept it or not.

Copy link
Member

@gaiksaya gaiksaya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lets keep the changes to what the PR description and title says or update it. 2.17.2 manifests I believe should be in manifest for now until 2.18.0 is out.

@peterzhuamazon
Copy link
Member

Lets keep the changes to what the PR description and title says or update it. 2.17.2 manifests I believe should be in manifest for now until 2.18.0 is out.

Moved 2.17 back, thought we are already on 2.19 for some reason 😄 .

Thanks.

Signed-off-by: opensearch-ci <opensearch-infra@amazon.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
manifest-ci-check Run manifest ci check
Projects
Status: 👀 In review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants