Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add systemd configurations to strengthen OS core security #17107

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RajatGupta02
Copy link

@RajatGupta02 RajatGupta02 commented Jan 24, 2025

Description

Aims to strengthen the OS core security by using a stronger systemd unit configuration. The changes implement a form of sandboxing via systemd, protecting the system from potential vulnerabilities in the core or untrusted code (such as plugins).

Will be working on adding tests as suggested in the RFC: #1687

Related Issues

#16634

Supporting References

#16729
#1687

Check List

  • Functionality includes testing.
  • API changes companion pull request created, if applicable.
  • Public documentation issue/PR created, if applicable.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Signed-off-by: Rajat Gupta <gptrajat@amazon.com>
Copy link
Contributor

✅ Gradle check result for 71b2584: SUCCESS

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 72.37%. Comparing base (302a3fd) to head (5c66a46).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #17107      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     72.47%   72.37%   -0.11%     
+ Complexity    65618    65514     -104     
============================================
  Files          5291     5291              
  Lines        304347   304329      -18     
  Branches      44182    44181       -1     
============================================
- Hits         220578   220246     -332     
- Misses        65670    65973     +303     
- Partials      18099    18110      +11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@cwperks
Copy link
Member

cwperks commented Jan 24, 2025

@RajatGupta02 If this is targeting 3.0 can you add an entry in the CHANGELOG for 3.0?

Signed-off-by: Rajat Gupta <gptrajat@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Rajat Gupta <gptrajat@amazon.com>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we remove the diff from this file? we can update our docs to use the template based config for more advanced security option. That would also prevent this change to be a breaking change.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes sure 👍🏻

Copy link
Contributor

✅ Gradle check result for 0104456: SUCCESS

This reverts commit 71b2584.

Signed-off-by: Rajat Gupta <gptrajat@amazon.com>
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for c694f75: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Signed-off-by: Rajat Gupta <gptrajat@amazon.com>
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 7c0402c: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for d784b96: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Signed-off-by: Rajat Gupta <gptrajat@amazon.com>
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

❌ Gradle check result for facaca3: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 890612e: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@kumargu
Copy link
Contributor

kumargu commented Feb 12, 2025

@reta, do you think we can merge this while the Integration test PR is being worked on?

@reta
Copy link
Collaborator

reta commented Feb 12, 2025

@reta, do you think we can merge this while the Integration test PR is being worked on?

@kumargu yes, sure, I think we should be good, @RajatGupta02 could you please resolve the conflicts? thank you

Signed-off-by: Rajat Gupta <72070007+RajatGupta02@users.noreply.github.com>
@RajatGupta02
Copy link
Author

@kumargu yes, sure, I think we should be good, @RajatGupta02 could you please resolve the conflicts? thank you

Resolved 👍🏻

Copy link
Contributor

✅ Gradle check result for 5c66a46: SUCCESS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants