Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Rename] ElasticsearchParseException class in server module #169

Conversation

nknize
Copy link
Collaborator

@nknize nknize commented Mar 3, 2021

This PR refactors ElasticsearchParseException class in the server module to
OpenSearchParseException. References and usages throughout the rest of the
codebase are fully refactored.

relates #160

This commit refactors ElasticsearchParseException class in the server module to
OpenSearchParseException. References and usages throughout the rest of the
codebase are fully refactored.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Knize <nknize@amazon.com>
@nknize nknize added >FORK Related to the fork process Rename Renaming to OpenSearch labels Mar 3, 2021
…eException

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Knize <nknize@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Knize <nknize@amazon.com>
@odfe-release-bot
Copy link

Request for Admin to accept this test.

Copy link
Contributor

@adnapibar adnapibar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Couple of comments - looks good otherwise 👍

@@ -799,8 +799,8 @@ public String toString() {
org.elasticsearch.indices.IndexPrimaryShardNotAllocatedException::new, 33, UNKNOWN_VERSION_ADDED),
TRANSPORT_EXCEPTION(org.elasticsearch.transport.TransportException.class,
org.elasticsearch.transport.TransportException::new, 34, UNKNOWN_VERSION_ADDED),
ELASTICSEARCH_PARSE_EXCEPTION(org.elasticsearch.ElasticsearchParseException.class,
org.elasticsearch.ElasticsearchParseException::new, 35, UNKNOWN_VERSION_ADDED),
ELASTICSEARCH_PARSE_EXCEPTION(org.elasticsearch.OpenSearchParseException.class,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are we renaming the enums as part of a separate PR?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I think at this point making a separate sweeping rename PR is the right move

@nknize nknize merged commit de02614 into opensearch-project:rename/opensearch Mar 4, 2021
nknize added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2021
This commit refactors ElasticsearchParseException class in the server module to
OpenSearchParseException. References and usages throughout the rest of the
codebase are fully refactored.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Knize <nknize@amazon.com>
ritty27 pushed a commit to ritty27/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request May 12, 2024
ritty27 pushed a commit to ritty27/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request May 12, 2024
* Sort field in Hit deserializer should handle null events (opensearch-project#169)

Signed-off-by: Rene Cordier <rcordier@linagora.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Timmermans <mtimmermans@tripadvisor.com>

* Deprecating master terminology to support inclusive naming (opensearch-project#167)

* Deprecating master terminology to support inclusive naming

Signed-off-by: Vacha Shah <vachshah@amazon.com>

* Fixing tests against unreleased OpenSearch

Signed-off-by: Vacha Shah <vachshah@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Timmermans <mtimmermans@tripadvisor.com>

* Fix issue 172

Signed-off-by: Matt Timmermans <mtimmermans@tripadvisor.com>

* Add test for issue 172

Signed-off-by: Matt Timmermans <mtimmermans@tripadvisor.com>

Co-authored-by: Rene Cordier <rene.cordier@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Vacha Shah <vachshah@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: Matt Timmermans <mtimmermans@tripadvisor.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
>FORK Related to the fork process Rename Renaming to OpenSearch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants