Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Manual Backport 1.x] ci: reduce redundancy by using matrix strategy on Windows and Linux workflows #4022

Conversation

joshuarrrr
Copy link
Member

backport 1e127b0 from #3514

…rch-project#3514)

* ci: reduce redundancy by using matrix strategy on Windows and Linux workflows (opensearch-project#3514)
* update CHANGELOG.md (opensearch-project#3514)
* ci: fix overriding matrix for Linux x86 (opensearch-project#3514)
* ci: update os checks in preparation for darwin (opensearch-project#3514)

Signed-off-by: Julian Labatut <julian.labatut@etu.umontpellier.fr>
Co-authored-by: Miki <miki@amazon.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1e127b0)
@joshuarrrr
Copy link
Member Author

@kavilla This was a fairly naive attempt to manually backport - I mostly just accepted all incoming changes, so there may be some subtleties in the workflow differences between 1.x and main that I didn't account for.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 16, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #4022 (af71008) into 1.x (916c096) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              1.x    #4022   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   67.50%   67.50%           
=======================================
  Files        3044     3044           
  Lines       58692    58692           
  Branches     8902     8902           
=======================================
  Hits        39619    39619           
  Misses      16925    16925           
  Partials     2148     2148           
Flag Coverage Δ
Linux 67.45% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Windows 67.45% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@joshuarrrr
Copy link
Member Author

Closing as no longer necessary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants