-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8320995: RISC-V: C2 PopCountVI #19065
Conversation
/solves JDK-8320996 |
👋 Welcome back mli! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@Hamlin-Li This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 77 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@Hamlin-Li |
@Hamlin-Li The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
@@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ define_pd_global(intx, InlineSmallCode, 1000); | |||
product(bool, UseZtso, false, EXPERIMENTAL, "Assume Ztso memory model") \ | |||
product(bool, UseZihintpause, false, EXPERIMENTAL, \ | |||
"Use Zihintpause instructions") \ | |||
product(bool, UseZvbb, false, "Use Zvbb instructions") \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't this be marked EXPERIMENTAL
as we have no hardware to test it on?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, you're right.
Fixed.
src/hotspot/cpu/riscv/riscv_v.ad
Outdated
|
||
instruct vpopcount_mask(vReg dst_src, vRegMask_V0 v0) %{ | ||
match(Set dst_src (PopCountVI dst_src v0)); | ||
match(Set dst_src (PopCountVL dst_src v0)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a reason to force input & output being the same vector register?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems not, I modify it to usual pattern.
@@ -175,6 +175,9 @@ void RiscvHwprobe::add_features_from_query_result() { | |||
if (is_set(RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0, RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZBS)) { | |||
VM_Version::ext_Zbs.enable_feature(); | |||
} | |||
if (is_set(RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0, RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZVBB)) { | |||
VM_Version::ext_Zvbb.enable_feature(); | |||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it's appropriate to auto-enable an experimental extension.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for catching, fixed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One minor comment remains, otherwise looks good. Thanks.
@@ -26,12 +26,14 @@ | |||
* @summary Test vectorization of popcount for Long | |||
* @requires vm.compiler2.enabled | |||
* @requires ((os.arch=="x86" | os.arch=="i386" | os.arch=="amd64" | os.arch=="x86_64") & vm.cpu.features ~= ".*avx512bw.*") | | |||
* os.simpleArch == "aarch64" | |||
* os.simpleArch == "aarch64" | | |||
* (os.arch == "riscv64" & vm.cpu.features ~= ".*zvbb,.*") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggestion: (os.arch == "riscv64" & vm.cpu.features ~= ".*zvbb.*")
The comma should not be there. See: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8327689
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, fixed.
Thanks @luhenry @RealFYang for your reviewing. /integrate |
Going to push as commit 1aebab7.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@Hamlin-Li Pushed as commit 1aebab7. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi,
Can you help to review this patch?
Both auto-vect and vector api depends on this intrinsic.
Thanks!
Performance
Not performance test was done, as this depends on vcpop.v instruction in zvbb extension and the code seqeunce is rather simple than non-intrinsic version.
Progress
Issues
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19065/head:pull/19065
$ git checkout pull/19065
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/19065
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19065/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 19065
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 19065
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19065.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment