Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add flag to remove registration from app #387

Conversation

kaustavb12
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Some OpenedX operators want user registration disabled from their UIs, so that user registration can be operated through the APIs, from external applications like salesforce. Currently we don't have such an option for this android app.

This PR adds a flag called REGISTRATION_ENABLED which controls if Registration option is displayed to users.

Testing instructions

  1. Checkout and setup this branch
  2. Set REGISTRATION_ENABLED to true in config and verify Registration button/link is visible.
  3. Set REGISTRATION_ENABLED to false in config and verify Registration button/link is gone.

Other information

Private Ref : BB-9186

@openedx-webhooks openedx-webhooks added the open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U label Oct 23, 2024
@openedx-webhooks
Copy link

Thanks for the pull request, @kaustavb12!

What's next?

Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review:

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

  • If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
    • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
  • If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

  • Dependencies

    This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

  • Blockers

    This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

  • Timeline information

    This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

  • Partner information

    This is for a course on edx.org.

  • Supporting documentation
  • Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:

Who will review my changes?

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/openedx-mobile-maintainers. Tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for review.

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

  • The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
  • The need for product review
  • Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

@mphilbrick211 mphilbrick211 requested a review from a team October 24, 2024 21:05
Copy link
Contributor

@volodymyr-chekyrta volodymyr-chekyrta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your contribution! 🚀
Please address the following feedback:

isRegistrationEnabled = false,
)
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add a new line to the end of the file

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added

@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ private fun AuthForm(
.fillMaxWidth()
.padding(top = 20.dp, bottom = 36.dp)
) {
if (state.isLogistrationEnabled.not()) {
if (state.isLogistrationEnabled.not() and state.isRegistrationEnabled) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please change and to && to keep style consistency.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changed

@kaustavb12
Copy link
Contributor Author

@volodymyr-chekyrta Thanks a lot for the review.

I have addressed both the feedback points, please take a look.

@volodymyr-chekyrta
Copy link
Contributor

@volodymyr-chekyrta Thanks a lot for the review.

I have addressed both the feedback points, please take a look.

@kaustavb12, Looks good to me 👍 Thank you!
Could you please change the target branch to develop, and we're good to merge 🚀

@kaustavb12 kaustavb12 force-pushed the kaustav/remove_register_button_upstream branch from bbec96c to 17130c4 Compare October 29, 2024 10:52
@kaustavb12 kaustavb12 changed the base branch from main to develop October 29, 2024 10:53
@kaustavb12
Copy link
Contributor Author

@volodymyr-chekyrta

Target changed to develop, rebased and squashed. Please take a look.

@volodymyr-chekyrta volodymyr-chekyrta merged commit 0de8db1 into openedx:develop Oct 29, 2024
4 checks passed
@kaustavb12
Copy link
Contributor Author

@volodymyr-chekyrta Thanks a lot for your help with review and merge.

@kaustavb12 kaustavb12 deleted the kaustav/remove_register_button_upstream branch October 29, 2024 14:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants