Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "fix merge_async_iterators usage for vLLM>0.5.4" #88

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2024

Conversation

dtrifiro
Copy link
Contributor

@dtrifiro dtrifiro commented Aug 8, 2024

This reverts commit 09290e6.

The mandatory is_cancelled kwarg was made optional in vllm-project/vllm#7282

This reverts commit 09290e6.

The mandatory `is_cancelled` kwarg was made optional in
vllm-project/vllm#7282
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 61.02%. Comparing base (96b8e0f) to head (455bee8).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #88      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   61.19%   61.02%   -0.17%     
==========================================
  Files          20       20              
  Lines        1193     1188       -5     
  Branches      211      210       -1     
==========================================
- Hits          730      725       -5     
  Misses        387      387              
  Partials       76       76              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dtrifiro dtrifiro added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 12, 2024
@njhill
Copy link
Contributor

njhill commented Aug 12, 2024

I think it should be fine to merge this since the original change was also post-0.5.4

Merged via the queue into main with commit 061a3d3 Aug 12, 2024
3 checks passed
@dtrifiro dtrifiro deleted the revert-pr-86 branch August 12, 2024 18:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants