Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove kind/resource type mentions from metadata.name in resources #557

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2024

Conversation

amadhusu
Copy link
Contributor

The issue resolved by this Pull Request:

Resolves RHOAIENG-1680

Description of your changes:

This PR removes kind/resource type mentions from metadata.name in resources

Testing instructions

Just normal Sanity checks

Checklist

  • The commits are squashed in a cohesive manner and have meaningful messages.
  • Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
  • The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work

@dsp-developers
Copy link
Contributor

A new image has been built to help with testing out this PR: quay.io/opendatahub/data-science-pipelines-operator:pr-557
An OCP cluster where you are logged in as cluster admin is required.

To use this image run the following:

cd $(mktemp -d)
git clone git@github.com:opendatahub-io/data-science-pipelines-operator.git
cd data-science-pipelines-operator/
git fetch origin pull/557/head
git checkout -b pullrequest 11d6114a7fa26b92f480e3d4536b90e25cbcf1da
make deploy IMG="quay.io/opendatahub/data-science-pipelines-operator:pr-557"

More instructions here on how to deploy and test a Data Science Pipelines Application.

@amadhusu
Copy link
Contributor Author

amadhusu commented Jan 29, 2024

/test

Copy link
Contributor

@gregsheremeta gregsheremeta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aren't there RoleBindings that would need to be changed as well? (edit: or in this case, ClusterRoleBindings...)

@amadhusu
Copy link
Contributor Author

amadhusu commented Jan 30, 2024

Aren't there RoleBindings that would need to be changed as well? (edit: or in this case, ClusterRoleBindings...)

@gregsheremeta I couldn't find any ClusterRoleBindings in this case. Do you have a reference point if any?

@gregsheremeta
Copy link
Contributor

Nope, I'm not very familiar with them.

@gmfrasca do you know if there are ClusterRoleBindings somewhere that would also need to be changed?

@DharmitD
Copy link
Member

DharmitD commented Feb 7, 2024

Nope, I'm not very familiar with them.

@gmfrasca do you know if there are ClusterRoleBindings somewhere that would also need to be changed?

Looks like the CRBs were deleted by this commit on the dspv2 branch: 85d2e0f

So yeah they don't exist and you wouldn't need to update them.

@amadhusu amadhusu changed the base branch from dspv2 to main February 7, 2024 17:38
Signed-off-by: Achyut Madhusudan <amadhusu@redhat.com>
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 7, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign gregsheremeta for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@dsp-developers
Copy link
Contributor

Change to PR detected. A new PR build was completed.
A new image has been built to help with testing out this PR: quay.io/opendatahub/data-science-pipelines-operator:pr-557

Copy link
Member

@DharmitD DharmitD left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Feb 7, 2024
@HumairAK HumairAK merged commit 4eb57c5 into opendatahub-io:main Feb 8, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants