-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove kind/resource type mentions from metadata.name in resources #557
Conversation
A new image has been built to help with testing out this PR: To use this image run the following: cd $(mktemp -d)
git clone git@github.com:opendatahub-io/data-science-pipelines-operator.git
cd data-science-pipelines-operator/
git fetch origin pull/557/head
git checkout -b pullrequest 11d6114a7fa26b92f480e3d4536b90e25cbcf1da
make deploy IMG="quay.io/opendatahub/data-science-pipelines-operator:pr-557" More instructions here on how to deploy and test a Data Science Pipelines Application. |
/test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aren't there RoleBindings that would need to be changed as well? (edit: or in this case, ClusterRoleBindings...)
@gregsheremeta I couldn't find any ClusterRoleBindings in this case. Do you have a reference point if any? |
Nope, I'm not very familiar with them. @gmfrasca do you know if there are ClusterRoleBindings somewhere that would also need to be changed? |
Signed-off-by: Achyut Madhusudan <amadhusu@redhat.com>
11d6114
to
68ac72f
Compare
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Change to PR detected. A new PR build was completed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
The issue resolved by this Pull Request:
Resolves RHOAIENG-1680
Description of your changes:
This PR removes kind/resource type mentions from metadata.name in resources
Testing instructions
Just normal Sanity checks
Checklist