Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed stix parsing with setvalue types #907

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 26, 2022

Conversation

baulus
Copy link
Contributor

@baulus baulus commented Apr 26, 2022

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 26, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #907 (2a9853e) into develop (159f936) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 50.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #907      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    63.71%   63.71%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          483      483              
  Lines        44069    44071       +2     
===========================================
+ Hits         28080    28081       +1     
- Misses       15989    15990       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
.../stix_translation/src/utils/stix_pattern_parser.py 83.56% <50.00%> (-0.95%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 159f936...2a9853e. Read the comment docs.

@baulus baulus requested a review from mdazam1942 April 26, 2022 15:39
@mdazam1942 mdazam1942 merged commit 268aa38 into develop Apr 26, 2022
@mdazam1942 mdazam1942 deleted the stix_parsing_with_setvalue_fix branch April 26, 2022 16:20
mdazam1942 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2022
mdazam1942 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2022
mdazam1942 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2022
mdazam1942 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants