New UDI connector module for IBM Security Verify

[kr-riteshsinha]

This Pull has been requested for module verify which is developed to communicate with IBM Security Verify.
Please review and let us know if any changes are required.

[delliott90]

Should the previous PR be closed? #785

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #802 (82ffba8) into develop (521bb1d) will decrease coverage by 0.29%.
The diff coverage is 71.42%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #802      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    63.99%   63.69%   -0.30%     
===========================================
  Files          437      452      +15     
  Lines        39038    39886     +848     
===========================================
+ Hits         24981    25406     +425     
- Misses       14057    14480     +423     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
..._security_verify/stix_transmission/error_mapper.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...bm_security_verify/stix_transmission/api_client.py	16.05% <19.13%> (ø)
...urity_verify/stix_translation/query_constructor.py	41.92% <75.77%> (ø)
...ecurity_verify/stix_transmission/ping_connector.py	80.95% <80.95%> (ø)
...rity_verify/stix_transmission/results_connector.py	70.96% <81.48%> (ø)
...urity_verify/stix_transmission/delete_connector.py	87.50% <87.50%> (ø)
...test/stix_translation/test_ibm_verify_transform.py	50.54% <88.46%> (ø)
.../stix_transmission/test_ibm_verify_transmission.py	67.24% <97.50%> (ø)
...shifter_modules/ibm_security_verify/entry_point.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...curity_verify/stix_translation/query_translator.py	81.81% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 5 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 521bb1d...82ffba8. Read the comment docs.

[kr-riteshsinha]

Should the previous PR be closed? #785

I have closed pull request #785

[mdazam1942]

If the full product name is IBM Security Verify then I would change the module name to ibm_security_verify instead of just verify.

[pcoccoli]

You only need the single quotes around properties with dashes, like 'x-iam-ext', you don't need them on policy_action etc. since those use _ not -.

[mdazam1942]

build needs to be fixed. failure in unittests

[mdazam1942]

@kr-riteshsinha can you please add stix 2.1 mappings as well? here's the example: https://github.com/opencybersecurityalliance/stix-shifter/tree/develop/stix_shifter_modules/qradar/stix_translation/json/stix_2_1
you can follow this stix2.1 documentation for major changes https://docs.oasis-open.org/cti/stix/v2.1/csprd01/stix-v2.1-csprd01.html#_Toc16070580

Reach out to us if you have difficulty to create 2.1 mappings.