Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove cybox false flag for observed-data properties #1502

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 7, 2023

Conversation

delliott90
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 5, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: -0.01 ⚠️

Comparison is base (27bbb6c) 85.17% compared to head (fd31407) 85.16%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1502      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    85.17%   85.16%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          679      679              
  Lines        53146    53148       +2     
===========================================
- Hits         45267    45264       -3     
- Misses        7879     7884       +5     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...s/stix_translation/test_aws_athena_json_to_stix.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...tests/stix_translation/test_splunk_json_to_stix.py 99.53% <100.00%> (ø)
...lation/src/json_to_stix/json_to_stix_translator.py 89.03% <100.00%> (-1.59%) ⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ def __init__(self, data_source, ds_to_stix_map, transformers, options, callback=
self.callback = callback

# parse through options
self.cybox_default = options.get('cybox_default', True)
# self.cybox_default = options.get('cybox_default', True)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this line is not needed anymore. do you want to keep it for future reference since you commented out?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants