Replace Brendan Burns with Steve Lasker on maintainers.

[brendandburns]

This PR must get at least 5 LGTMs before merging:

• Brendan Burns bburns@microsoft.com (@brendandburns)
• Jon Johnson jonjohnson@google.com (@jonjohnsonjr)
• John Starks jostarks@microsoft.com (@jstarks)
• Jonathan Boulle jon@nstack.com (@jonboulle)
• Stephen Day stevvooe@gmail.com (@stevvooe)
• Vincent Batts vbatts@redhat.com (@vbatts)
• Aleksa Sarai asarai@suse.de (@cyphar)

Signed-off-by: Brendan Burns bburns@microsoft.com

[brendandburns]

LGTM (obviously)

Rescinding LGTM.

[AkihiroSuda]

needs rebase

[vbatts]

I'm not sure that these three PR's for maintainers accurately surface a maintainer election process.

It seems that while just barely, we have had a re-kindled interaction among maintainers recently, spurred by this initial audit.
Though two of the nominees (vrothberg and tych0) are not really present in reviews, PRs or the calls. Lasker is present in discussion and the calls, but not in contributions.

I move that we close these (#841 #842 #844) and among the active contributors as we continue rekindling, we have a proper nomination.

[jonboulle]

agree with vbatts - I think we can close these and reconsider "proper" nominations in the coming weeks if there's general sentiment it's desirable.

[dlorenc]

Should this be closed?

This one is different from #842 since it's a resignation and a nomination. Is there any real reason they should be coupled?

[vbatts]

Closing these three PRs (#841 #842 #844), so that adding/replacing maintainers can go through the regular nomination process