Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

manifest: Explicitly unspecified attributes for the initial layer directory #408

Conversation

wking
Copy link
Contributor

@wking wking commented Oct 20, 2016

Point out that the layer's initial empty directory has unspecified attributes. Layer authors interested in the ownership and other attributes of the unpacked root directory should explicitly set an entry for it.

Spun off from #318 to focus on a single point.

…ectory

Point out that the layer's initial empty directory has unspecified
attributes.  Layer authors interested in the ownership and other
attributes of the unpacked root directory should explicitly set an
entry for it.

This commit originally focused on requiring the initial directory to
be empty before the layers are unpacked into it.  But most of that was
picked up in fed7241 (manifest: clarify the order of layers,
2016-09-29, opencontainers#349).  I'd recommended "match" instead of "be" to allow
folks to apply via a union filesystem or whatever. As long as the
finished product is right, compliance testers and users should be
satisfied.

Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
@stevvooe
Copy link
Contributor

stevvooe commented Oct 20, 2016

LGTM

Approved with PullApprove

1 similar comment
@vbatts
Copy link
Member

vbatts commented Oct 20, 2016

LGTM

Approved with PullApprove

@vbatts vbatts merged commit e66ad79 into opencontainers:master Oct 20, 2016
@wking wking deleted the unspecified-attributes-for-initial-layer-base-2 branch October 21, 2016 06:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants