Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[editorial] specification/README: adjust Hugo front-matter linkTitle field #3481

Merged

Conversation

chalin
Copy link
Contributor

@chalin chalin commented May 8, 2023

@chalin chalin requested review from a team May 8, 2023 16:00
@arminru arminru added the editorial Editorial changes only (typos, changelog, ...). No content-related changes of any kind. label May 8, 2023
- Adjusts linkTitle in support of open-telemetry/opentelemetry.io#2642
- Was originally: Drops linkTitle because it is auto-generated since open-telemetry/opentelemetry.io#2666
@chalin chalin force-pushed the chalin-im-spec-no-linktitle-2023-05-08 branch from 18f61e8 to 42151db Compare May 8, 2023 18:00
@chalin chalin changed the title [editorial] specification/README: drop Hugo front-matter linkTitle field [editorial] specification/README: adjust Hugo front-matter linkTitle field May 8, 2023
@chalin
Copy link
Contributor Author

chalin commented May 8, 2023

Hi all: since we'll be adding the OTLP spec separately to the website (for details, see open-telemetry/opentelemetry.io#2642 (comment)), I've repurposed this PR to adjust the linkTitle rather than drop it. Apologies for the churn, and thanks!

@chalin
Copy link
Contributor Author

chalin commented May 8, 2023

/cc @tigrannajaryan @svrnm @cartermp

@reyang reyang merged commit ffeec00 into open-telemetry:main May 8, 2023
@chalin chalin deleted the chalin-im-spec-no-linktitle-2023-05-08 branch May 8, 2023 22:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
editorial Editorial changes only (typos, changelog, ...). No content-related changes of any kind.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants